How Will America Respond to Chinese World Domination?
Monday, April 14, 2008 — John SavageRandall Parker has an interesting post at ParaPundit linking to a Daily Mail article speculating on whether the rise of China as a superpower will bring about the defeat of PC in America. My main reasoning is: Is there really any evidence that declining nations imitate rising nations?
We all know that rising nations imitate nations that are already at the peak of their power, even sometimes once the latter are past the peak of their power. Hence the Asian nations’ imitation of the West in the 19th and 20th centuries. I think, though, that declining nations just get stuck in a rut, repeating the same mistakes more and more. I’m reminded of the old C.S. Lewis quote:
We direct the fashionable outcry of each generation against those vices of which it is least in danger and fix its approval on the virtue nearest to that vice which we are trying to make endemic.
Isn’t this the way of declining powers? To convince ourselves that the status quo regime is precisely everything it is not — in our case racist, intolerant, overly religious, “xenophobic”, and so forth? And therefore we need to make it even more “American”, where “American” is (unfortunately) defined as advocating open society without limit?
I wish I thought we might become more “Chinese” in some sense, more Kinist, or one might even say Confucian to the extent that Confucianism doesn’t conflict with Christianity. However, the rising power of another country is not going to be what persuades us that our ways don’t work. We are too prone to ideological delusions, fitting our beliefs to wishful thinking rather than hard, often unpleasant facts. This is probably the way of all humanity, but particularly the West, which has always been more prone to reject tradition and authority than any other civilization. The Chinese, observing the pitfalls of orthodox communism, decided it wasn’t important “whether the cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice”. Sadly, whites probably have a genetic tendency to obsess about what ought, rather than what is. Americans, on the whole, have too much pride in abstract notions to emulate Chinese realism.
We are fighting an uphill battle.
Monday, April 14, 2008 at 4:32 pm
Fighting an uphill battle against ourselves. Why don’t more people stand up and speak up? How could McCain be nominated? Why do whites vote for Obama? Do they want to be mugged? Why do people defend Bill Gates on H-1B as I see in some places? Do they want low wages and no negotiating power at work?
Why is it so few speak up? How could people go ashore at Normandy to die and far fewer than died there are willing to blog blatantly to stop 3rd world immigration, legal or not?
How could almost the whole nation denounce Virgil Goode with only a small number speaking up to defend him? As Charlton Heston said at Harvard, we are cowards with a few exceptions.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 3:54 am
John, You pose good questions and Old Atlantic has pointed out our present situation correctly.
Cecil John Rhodes, referred to in the article from the Daily Mail, was one of the primary funders for the groups which have led us to this point. He knew that the British island would be without influence in the world once Britain had lost control of it’s territories, and sought to extend that influence through teachings instituting Fabian Socialism. This basically is oligarchic or, as presently instituted, corporate communism. Rhodes scholarships are a small portion of how those teachings are passed along. The CFR, RIIA and numerous other groups sprouting from those teachings have resulted in internationalist corporate/financial agendas which have no alliegience to countries or peoples.
Trading with the “enemy” is only normal business within the eyes of those who are communists by evolution rather than communists by revolution. Evidences of that abound throughout the establishment of the Soviet state and through the cold war, and continues today with all other communist/Islamic nations. There can be no true conflict between these communist monoliths of the evolutionary and the revolutionary doctrines, except by their own stated deceptive theory. It is not the grassroots who will rise to rule the nirvana, but the oligarchs within the corporate and the social presidiums. Finance and money is their nirvana.
Most people today are too young to remember what it was like to have what could really be called true freedom within a somewhat socialized nation, which existed until the mid-sixties. The changes were too great and too fast after the 1970’s for people to recognize that their freedoms had been lost. “Success” today is how well we serve the financial socialists and how “tolerent” we become in accepting views which are foreign to normal free people.
I have a recent post by an Australian writer on my site, A Comparison of Australian/Western Autogenocide, which gives an insight on how they are presently going through the beginning phases of Chinese takeover, having been “softened” by the Multiculturalist/Leftist/Islamic alliances. It might be somewhat helpful in seeing what coming trends might be. Chinese expansion is certain, and efforts of those “westerners” such as Maurice Strong, Micael Gorbachev, George Soros and the Clintons insures that the groundwork is made easier for that expansion.
Explore the comments of others who have been under Chinese domination in any other society and you will find that they are hard taskmasters with no tolerence for deviation. Communism is not dead. It is the monolithic monster which it has always been. The Chinese head is even worse than the British/American head, but they are both part of the same monster.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 7:32 am
Flanders Fields, I looked at the post you mentioned, thanks for the tip. I think the blogger message saying objectionable content is very interesting. It shows someone is tracking the opposition to white democide and trying to discredit it. That should make us more determined to speak up not less.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Flanders, thanks, that’s a great post about Australian autogenocide. OA, you are right about the flagging. I wonder if they are going to take down the site like they did with South Africa Sucks. We should all back up our blogs at least weekly, I think.
Flanders, I think actually in some ways our government is as communist as the Chinese these days. I don’t think of China as an ideological state, but just one that will do whatever it takes to weaken and take advantage of America — especially buying American elections.
OA, good points and you have a rousing message there. I hope readers will be mobilized to dedicate more energy to persuading others that we need to save our race.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 1:56 pm
I am going to add that Australian blog to my blogroll. It looks good.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 4:58 pm
After reading “Boreas Rising: White Nationalism and the Geopolitics of the Paris-Berlin-Moscow Axis” I have to question whether it isn’t better that the US empire fall so as to allow Europe, especially Eastern Europe, a better chance at building a coalition of monocultural states.
And once such arose it would perhaps exert influence on the collapsed America, hopefully remaking America in Europe’s image.
—
America doesn’t need a China or an al Qaeda to unite Americans; it needs a lack of a foreign threat to allow natural divisions to either break it up or to create an ethnic focus among whites (if such is possible.) And it might well benefit from a collapsing empire or a realignment of power if such allowed it to look inwards.
Wednesday, April 16, 2008 at 10:00 am
[...] further ado, then: In light of what I quoted on Monday from C.S. Lewis, is it typical for each human culture to believe its nature to be [...]