How People Miscegenate
Tuesday, March 25, 2008 — John SavageNew blogger Guy White is off to a great start, for instance with today’s post on the way that many feminists only hate white men:
Feminists hysterically assault white men, most of whom are completely submissive to their wives and girlfriends to a degree unseen in any society in the world at any time. But the hip-hop lyrics about killing, raping and pimping women, as well as abandonment of their children and “baby mommas”, is accepted as a natural part of the African-American culture.
Feminists may be opposed to having sex with white men (or to give birth to white men), but there’s nothing they enjoy more than getting screwed by blacks. Feminism has always been Black Empowerment’s “b****”.
Of course, it seems to me that there’s a strong tendency for white women — not just feminists — to like the idea of miscegenating with black or Hispanic men. It seems to be a fact that white men prefer to miscegenate with Asian women but almost never with black women, while white women usually prefer to miscegenate with black or Hispanic men, but hardly ever Asians. Part of it has to be that despite feminist rhetoric, women love a strong man. Black and Hispanic men, even when marginally employed, are seen as the manliest men. On the other hand, Asian women are seen as the most feminine, while black women are seen as not very feminine at all.
Any better explanations?
Tuesday, March 25, 2008 at 6:34 pm
Blacks might be more prone to polygamy and East Asians to monogamy.
This theory is buttressed by the fact that black males do not live as long as do East Asians. Males adapted to polygamy tend to be full of hormones I think which make them more fit at the expense of their life span (it wears them out.)
While monogamy is well suited for civilisation, blacks supposedly have fewer deleterious genes… meaning that our breeding habits might be short term oriented, though perhaps they could be corrected without violating monogamy.
—
Btw, I wonder if the slanted eyes of East Asians are an adaptation that helps prevent snow blindness.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Whites seem to have uniquely adapted to civilisation while the other races seem to have adapted to their unique environments.
This makes me believe whites are the first to have lived in civilisations, though we’ve been outside a eugenically oriented civilisation for some time. (The original ancient civilisations all crashed.) And as a result East Asians and Jews (who I suspect are but a mix of the three races) have passed us in intelligence since their societies are eugenically oriented with regard to intelligence. Actually, ours seems to be dysgenic with regard to intelligence.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008 at 8:54 pm
maybe the feminists have done what they wanted to the white men, so now they are on to other races to do the same thing?! lol
Wednesday, March 26, 2008 at 1:25 am
Sailer’s article on interracial lovin’, which is apparently his all time highest response-generator, and the most passionate responses too:
http://www.isteve.com/IsLoveColorblind.htm
responses:
http://isteve.com/intmore1.htm
2003 update:
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/interracial_marriage.htm
Sailer’s other articles on and around the subject:
http://isteve.com/Articles_Interracial_Marriage.htm
I don’t mean to break some sort of blog etiquette with all those links btw, I wont make it a habit. And I am in no way affiliated with the Sailer industry! But I think those pieces really cover the issue well, and if you’re not that interested the main ideas are pretty clear pretty quick.
Bottom line: Since women go for masculinity, the interracial breaks favor black men and go against Asian men. As go body-fat ratios and testosterone, so go the ladies. Likewise, men go for femininity so the breaks go in the opposite direction there. It’s become a pretty well known social phenomenon that black ladies and Asian lads are getting the short end of it all. I’m not aware of any see-no-racialism explanations for it yet, but I’m sure they’re fun.
And yes, women like dark guys and men like fair girls. I’m not sure if or how that relates to the masculine-feminine thing but again, it’s good for black men, bad for their sisters.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008 at 1:27 am
yeah um..if I double posted, please feel free to delete. And this too…
Wednesday, March 26, 2008 at 9:31 am
Rhine, thank you for the link to the Sailer articles. I think I had read it before, but had forgotten about it.
You are more than welcome to post links — just bear in mind that they usually get caught in my spam box and have to wait for approval.
Sailer’s is a pretty simple and elegant explanation.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008 at 10:55 am
Look at who the feminists were: Steinam, Dworkin, Nussbaum. It should be obvious why this group would want to lessen the racial and ethnic pride of the dominant WASP majority and also knew that decades of propaganda about evil whites, authentic blacks, and heroic sacrifices for equality would have their effect.
Frankly, though, outside of a few educated couples where there was some mutual attraction based on similar interests, the vast majority of interracial couples seem to be low class, fatherless working class white girls and glib underemployed black men. After a few years, you see these forlorn broke girls with their half-black kids at the mall. You realize their prospects are really doomed. Some generous and decent white guy might be willing to raise some other white man’s kids if he loved her enough and respected her pro-life decision. No one would know what was up from afar.
But it would be shameful and a public testament to his “sucker” status to be walking around Disney or the Mall with this half-black kid. “Hey, look at me, I’m the beta male provider she hooked up after some virile black guy knocked her up and left her years ago. She gets best of both worlds: raw animal attraction and beta male reliability to raise the kids.”
Thursday, March 27, 2008 at 2:33 am
Feminists, at least the prominent ones, are always leftists, first and foremost, and that explains their anti-white male biases. Their leftist ideology really trumps their supposed concern for their ’sisters’ or for the well-being of women in general. This is visible even in non-racial contexts. For example, during the Clinton scandals of the 90s, the feminists, who were so outraged over sexual harassment when it involved a Republican (Bob Packwood) suddenly decided that it wasn’t so bad when one of their own (Bill Clinton) was accused of harassment and rape. Then these feminists, who for 25 years had been claiming that women never falsely accused men of rape or harassment, suddenly decided that Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick were false accusers. So their ‘feminism’ is secondary to their ideology. Liberals always reserve the right to contradict themselves and defy consistent principles.
As for women preferring dark men, whether dark Caucasian men, or especially, black men, I don’t think that’s innate. I think it’s culturally conditioned these days. I notice a lot of the young women today openly admire black men, but back when I was young, that was not true at all. Sexual attractions are susceptible to manipulation and cultural/societal pressures. Some things which are primal are still somewhat malleable. Speaking for myself alone, I don’t and never have found ‘tall, dark and handsome’ to be the ideal, at least not if ‘dark’ means swarthy.
-VA
Thursday, March 27, 2008 at 8:04 am
VA, that’s interesting. Being mostly innate would explain the divergence in which white men prefer Asians, but white women prefer blacks. But I think there’s also a socially-conditioned explanation, where a white man’s interest in black women would be taken as “oppression”, while a white woman-black man couple is taken to be more equal.
I personally have never found Asian women appealing myself, although my parents’ enthusiasm for the idea probably dampened my interest in it from the start. I think there was a sense in my family that Asians rejected anti-intellectual attitudes, and thus I would be highly respected by Asians in a way that I wasn’t always respected by whites. This attitude that somehow certain white personality types will find more compatibility by miscegenating, I just can’t understand.
When I was in college, which is about the only time I was around a lot of Asians anyway, it seemed like all the Asian women were looking for a good Asian husband. The Asian community (at least the East Asians) was so fiercely ethnocentric that I can’t imagine a white man ever managed to date any of the Asians!
Thursday, March 27, 2008 at 8:11 am
Roach, you wrote:
“The vast majority of interracial couples seem to be low class, fatherless working class white girls and glib underemployed black men.”
Yes, I think that’s true, at least if you construe “working class” rather broadly. In case we needed more reasons to have laws against miscegenation, protecting girls such as these from black men who certainly won’t be reliable providers is one more good one.
From my experience it seems that interracial relationships are fairly common for white girls who, one would think, have the looks to “marry up” despite a humble background. Now, for whatever reason, well-off men seem to always marry women who grew up well-off too — even if they make bad wives.
Thursday, March 27, 2008 at 9:35 am
Some East Asian girls certainly do go after whites, and have many whites chasing them.
They can be attractive when petite and with very light skin (I’ve heard some bleach their skin?), though white girls are better looking I think. I’ve never gone after Asians…
Saturday, March 29, 2008 at 10:15 pm
There is also the temperament issue.
Left liberal women seem to particularly like men who are extroverted and masculine in appearance, but are not serious and intellectual. Such men appear to be more common among Blacks than whites or Asians.
Having a serious, masculine intelligence is a big turn-off for many left-leaning women, who views such guys as repressed and insecure.
Fashions also seem to have an influence. For example, among whites there seems to be something of a trend against dark-featured males and blond women, in favour of boyish looking males in the Brad Pitt/Jude Law mould and exotic-looking brunettes.